Censorship promotes ignorance.
Censorship attempts to discourage or prevent access to media. Media contains information.
Failure to attain information perpetuates ignorance of that information. Preventing access to media prevents access to information. Censorship prevents access to media.
Censorship promotes ignorance.
No logical path can circumvent this simple truth. You may argue that most media contains inappropriate, false, irrelevant or irreverent information.
I neither deny nor admit the validity or value of information. I merely state that lack of information through censorship causes ignorance of that information.
You may argue that we are better off without some information.
I doubt the truth of this, but if in truth we are better off without some information, I question who has the wisdom and objectivity required to decide the information we are better off with and the information we are better off without.
Censors must access information to know the inappropriate qualities, false-hoods, irrelevance and irreverence of the information. If censors honestly, from direct contact, label media as inappropriate, false, irrelevant or irreverent, then the censors must have accessed the information. To allow a small group access to all information so they may restrict the amount of information available to the remainder of the population seems incompatible with the idea of a free society.
In a society that allows a minority to determine the level of ignorance to which the majority is subjected, who assigns the elite group? Who determines who sees all that they may keep the remainder in the dark? Who decides what is appropriate, true, relevant or reverent?
What criteria has been developed to determine how ignorant the general public should be?
Who developed the criteria?
You may argue, there is information that must be considered inappropriate for children.
If a child has the intellect needed to understand concepts and situations, then it must be time to introduce that child to those concepts and situations; to encourage the child to learn the social consequences, individual responsibilities and acceptable responses to those concepts and situations.
Ignorance is neither innocence nor bliss.
Rather than censor books, videos, photographs, movies, plays et al, perhaps we should teach students to interpret media and encourage our children to learn the art of applying discretion and proper response to inappropriate, deceiving, irrelevant and irreverent material. Imagine a culture comprised of people who make informed decisions about content they have directly experienced in contrast to a culture who day-to-day live the dark ignorance of censorship.
(Teaching people discretion where media is concerned would destroy many popular news sources but you have to break a few eggs … )
All censorship including the censorship of political correctness, the censorship of Church, the censorship of State, and especially, the censorship imposed by multinational corporations leads to ignorance of citizens.
We cannot afford more ignorance and should sense developing tragedy when companies we view as champions of quality let us down; when companies we look to for information products cave to invisible censors; censors who ignorantly deem themselves qualified to determine what you and I can read and watch.
Ignorance does not ignite the human spirit.
Long shadows dim our potential as free, creative and productive citizens; shadows cast from iron walls erected by champions of ignorance, champions we did not choose, champions claiming to protect us from ourselves without asking.
Champions who continually and deceptively promote themselves as mainstream.
Sounds like Science Fiction but it is right here, right now.
Censorship leads to ignorance.
Censorship is on the rise.