Corporate Silos – No hay nor corn

Facebook has made changes again. Corporate Silos are in the blogs again.

Most address privacy concerns but privacy concerns only distract us. We lost privacy when we obtained credit cards and agreed to pee in cups to get paid for our talent. 

How much less private can it get, really?

The real threat? Corporate silos, whether with intention or not, establish an environment  for censorship.

For twenty years we enjoyed Free Exchange of Information on an, open, distributed Internet .

New kinds of debate emerged. New stories linked to background. Study results linked to raw data – ideas transformed and branched in unprecedented ways. 

During the decade that saw a few holding companies take control of almost all television stations, radio stations and newspapers, Free Press was reinvented on the Internet. A rapidly enriched audience, outside the pale of advertising influence, discovered a frontier filled with information, ideas – not all to our liking but some eye-opening, which is the point of Free Press.  

Corporate Silos threaten Free Press on the Internet. They may not mean to. They have a goal to accomplish: generate profits – satisfy stockholders. If they fail, they go away. Protecting the Free Exchange of Ideas is not in their job description. If Free Press gets in the way, it goes away so they do not.

Worse, social-network silos create an environment ripe for a few companies to seize control of the Internet and implement policies that reduce it to something resembling cable TV: a thousand channels and no genuine choice.

Corporate Silos dictate tastes and values – motivated by revenue opportunities and subject to the tastes and values of other, outside corporate policy makers. Individuals are not the primary, if any, part of the algorithm. Stuck in the silo, individuals begin to forget about the rest of the world. Prime time television weaves a convenient and comfortable cocoon. Reality TV supplants ideas and insight.

We’ve enjoyed a two decade renaissance of idea. It would be a shame to see if fade away.

Corporate Silo describes a social-network site, like Facebook or Google +, who get people into the silo and try, like television stations, to keep users activity inside the silo. They control user experience through interface and filters. In some cases they censor content in and out of the silo.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Doing the Right Thing Wrong

August 9, 2011

Some people see dead people. Some people see stupid people. I see the Tower of Babble – every day – everywhere.

People speak and write, cajoling and persuading with words; words that do not mean the same thing to the persuader and the persuaded.

We all speak the same language here?

Or not. This may be a personal quirk – faulty wiring arcing in the recesses of neurosis. Or it may be reality.

Some days I sit in awe totally amazed language works at all. We (at least I) forget we come to conversation with private collections of words and phrases. We bring dictionaries filled with definitions all our own. It seems a miracle that mostly we get, if not exactly then close enough, what other people want us to get.

Consider – I started reading an article about the right thing and got the right thing wrong.

How could I get something as important as the right thing wrong? Not a right thing or that right thing or the what-bad-people-don’t-do right thing, but The Right Thing.

How can something as important as the right thing not signify the same right thing to everyone?

I did not disagree with the author in conscience but the thing that is the right thing in my head follows a completely different orbit; inhabits a completely different star system than the thing that is the right thing referred to in the post.

Seth Godin posted an article explaining why we cannot expect business to make ethical decisions (because people, not businesses make ethical decisions). He refers to ethical decisions as doing the right thing. I’d read half the article, struggling to connect the dots, before realizing my right thing was the wrong right thing for the article. Fortunately, the context explicitly defined what Seth meant by doing the right thing – that is, doing what is good for community.

Kudos to writers who define terms in context. Too many writers and speakers assume phrases ignite identical cognitive responses in each audience member; a cognitive response identical to that of the speaker/writer.

Once I read what he meant by the right thing, dots connected. I grokked his message and as usual, agreed with his conclusions. But why did he need to define the right thing for me? It seems natural (to me) that we define some concepts outside the enigmatic complexity of language – concepts, like the right thing, that affect everyone – individuals, communities and cultures – to the core. Why do we allow symbols of our most important ideas margin enough to evoke different responses in every mind?

We all speak the same language here?

Or not. We cannot avoid the ambiguity.

All our words, context to context, situation to situation, profession to profession and person to person consistently change connotation. The word God in my head, no matter how much you wish it wasn’t so, evokes scope and character different than the same word in your head. When I read Free, Freedom, Free Press or Free Lunch my synapses fire different sequences than yours.

The ubiquitous flux of language, perpetual shifting of nuance by situation and disparity of definition between people from diverse backgrounds should put us on constant alert for linguistic confusion. Yet, people surge forward without clarification and casually jump on bandwagons when words sound right. Later, when we feel betrayal because intention and interpretation did not sync, we explain it away.

“I did not know it would be like that.”

“It was not what I signed up for.”

And then we do it again.

People acquire enemies and waste debate not because they disagree with premise but because words look wrong. A phrase may unintentionally leave a bad taste. More often, when usage confuses, we go defensive, focussing energy on criticism instead of comprehension. Battles and feuds follow, fueled by conflict of lingo.

Accepting the ambiguous nature of language leads to uncommon awareness. Understanding the way meaning changes as circumstance changes brings responsibility. It falls to those who know how language works to promote precise usage. Beware. Pursuing accurate language leads to unpopular paths. People who fail to grok inherent ambiguity in language resent those who ask for clarification and react as if insulted that we should ask for explanation.

Sometimes I swear I can almost hear them think …

How don’t you know what I mean? Did I stutter?

Or are you stupid?

We all speak the same language here, don’t we?

© 2011 Chrome Poet

Posted in How to Read Poetry, Words | Leave a comment

Story, Reality, Life.

Story shapes our lives.

Stories are everywhere At the office we are story-tellers when we share last night’s adventures and tell sly little jokes. When we react to situations, data, information and proposals we are story-tellers.

We embrace stories that validate our life stories but we tread cautiously when faced with stories that rewrite parts of the stories we hold dear.

To keep main characters of our stories consistent with reality, we accept or refuse personal responsibility for day to day events.

Leaders tell stories to inspire. Experts tell stories to inform. Advertisers tell stories to sell shoes, food and plastic crap. People tell stories to amuse, warn, attract and repel.

As I write this, I am telling a story.

Most people recognize stories told with words but we do not limit stories to words. Our clever, tale-weaving species convey stories with every tool at our disposal. We share stories with movement, music and pictures. When we wince, smirk, sneer, shrug or smile, we expose bits of story and, intentionally or not, influence people who see us wince, smirk, sneer, shrug or smile. The clothes we wear, the cut of our hair – every gesture make and every pause we take tells a story. Parts of our story enter the plot lines of the people we meet.

Story creates reality.

From the moment of our first breath, parents, teachers, preachers and other authority figures begin programming our minds with stories. Stories expand tiny infantile worlds into mature Universes. Unavoidable stories fed to us during our impressionable years form cornerstones of our reality.

Ninety percent of what we think we know we think we know because we saw, read or heard a story. Of the far-reaching, ever-expanding reality our minds embrace, we can only touch fragments. Most reality comes to us not through experience but second-hand, wrapped in stories. When our paths cross concrete bits of reality, we process the concrete against the abstract contexts of our life stories. We display great skill at fitting experience to our stories; rarely do we feel a need to alter our life stories to fit the requirements of experience.

We tell each other the story that Reality creates Story but Story creates Reality.

We are Story.

Our universe is Story.

That’s my Story and I’m sticking to it.

Posted in Story | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Trust30 VI: Wanting

Today, let’s take a step away from rational thought and dare to be bold. What’s one thing you’ve always wanted to accomplish but have been afraid to pursue? Write it down. Also write down the obstacles in your way of reaching your goal. Finally, write down a tangible plan to overcome each obstacle.

The only thing left is to, you know, actually go make it happen. What are you waiting for?


Behind me lie two attempts to get this challenge out of the way. The phrase “… have been afraid to pursue?” puts me off. I understand people make decisions from fear. But not all of us do. If a person makes fear a reason to do rather than a reason to avoid, then how does this challenge relate?

In our young and formative years we accumulate a litany of cannot do’s and things to fear (sin, sex, sin, disobedience, forests, sex, large animals, heights, sin, running with pointed sticks, neighbors, sex, strangers, green monkeys, sin and on and on and on). Parents, preachers, teachers, politicians and ubiquitous media drum into young heads class restrictions, moral taboos, social no-nos and common sense barriers to potential – rules of behavior based on hearsay and yesterday’s realities.

A few individuals, condemned by curiosity and logic, come to realize much of cannot distorts reality or lacks imagination; that cannot, connoting actuality, is better labeled do not, denoting edict; that everything we know before acquiring pubic hair we were taught in a desperate attempt by authority figures to maintain status quo and preserve a hierarchy of power. 

Mingled with the curious, logical few, another, larger group marches into adulthood without questioning the yoke of social programming. 

Perhaps this challenge targets the latter group.

Another part of the challenge bugs me. “… one thing you’ve always wanted …” The key word here is wanted. 

Parents, preachers, teachers, politicians and media conspicuously discredit methods individuals adopt to explore and distinguish between urges induced by social-programming and genuine desires emanating from core-character. Before encouraging someone to do “… one thing you’ve always wanted …” a friend might suggest removing the mask attached by social pressure and uncovering what we want – in contrast to what we think we want. 

This may seem a silly notion to some. How does a person want something they do not really want? It happens. If social programs trigger an emotion and we fail to check the emotion against critical thinking an artificial but burning want can result. Emotion aches for a thing or situation. We apply effort but upon acquiring the object of our desire we too often find ourselves wondering “WTF, I thought this would make me feel better than I’m feelin’.”

Never happen to you? Congratulations. Good job. You live a blessed life. With embarrassment I admit direct experience of the previous paragraph not once but repeatedly. After many disappointments, on a Saturday morning, immediately following sunrise and an intense sauna, I copped a clue, dropped my shields and started work on the question of questions:

What the heck am I?

Dangerous question that. You want scary? Start digging toward your core – the You of you buried beneath veneered epistemes – stratified social programming accumulated during decades of obedience. Stepping inside and peeling the onion reveals a personal nature distinct from the civilized mask adopted to get through the day. Core-character does not rear dark, clawed and roaring with primitive violence but confronting core-character induces a shift from the smile we put on as we look in the mirror. Core-character threatens self-perception, ridicules life games adopted for success and reveals illusion in what we like to think we want. Approaching core-character ripples reality.

Oh boy. How did I end up here? Does anyone take new-age concepts like core-character seriously?

Uff Da. End of page. Need to get back on my head. Not a great wrap but I did not feel an immediate attraction to this challenge. Happens some times.

Note, some of the language above implies the conditions described exist universally in western civilization or to a lesser extent in the entire species. I cannot know that.

I do not pretend to know the state, process or condition of other Minds. Any sense that I do signifies a weakness of language. The conditions and situations presented above come exclusively from my personal history and imagination. They probably do not apply wholly to anyone and in part only to me. Have a great day.

Posted in Observations, Trust30 | 4 Comments

Trust30 Day 5: On Travel

Not everyone wants to travel the world, but most people can identify at least one place in the world they’d like to visit before they die. Where is that place for you, and what will you do to make sure you get there?


Places in the world are like books, too many to get to in one life time.

Travel, if done well, expands minds, vaporizes bigotry and nurtures tolerance. Travel, if done poorly, curbs growth, validates bigotry and provides rationalization for intolerance.

Experience suggests that people who never travel retain limited outlooks for all their lives. Of people who stay in one place except to go shopping we might justifiably say, some if not all, go through life with small minds.

Experience also suggests some people who travel much and frequently embrace the nurturing effects of variety find themselves eventually wanting more. Travel turns into a distraction from details. We consume a quick look, take a few photographs and move on. Every destination inspires planning for the next destination. We inhale the aroma of a place but in snapshot time, outside changing seasons and cultural momentum.

And travel distracts us from exploring the wonders surrounding home.

We live in a generalized age. Media attempts to homogenize culture with sound bites, foregoing local detail; pushing homogenized values with trivial stories that do not affect the daily lives of most readers/viewers. Global corporations infect regional diversity with viral, international sameness of product, style, color and sound. Travel becomes less exploration and more realization of widespread homogeny; of cultural loss.

Surrounding home, seeds of local and regional expression lie dormant. Climate, local economy and history teem with opportunity for regional style that satisfies uniquely local attitudes but anti-diversity media aimed at an internationally, lowest common denominator audience sucks our attention away. We fail to see, much less plant and nurture our differences. Individuality suffers. Our locality suffers. Our culture suffers.

The only place left to go, for me, is my back yard; to celebrate delightful details, to count blades of tufted grasses, gaze at prairie flowers, listen to unique combinations of birdsong and observe cycling seasons that happen this way only in this place, only in this year.

I do not mean to discourage travel. Travel early and travel often. Travel now before the strip mall that replaced your main street shows up in the places you want so much to visit. Travel and imbibe what remains of cultures after media erosion but do not forget to look up your street and into your back yard. Do not forget to nurture the things that make you and your neighbors unique.

Do not forget home.

Posted in Observations, Travel, Trust30 | 11 Comments

Trust30 – Day 4: Postit and Life Challenges

Identify one of your biggest challenges at the moment (ie I don’t feel passionate about my work) and turn it into a question (ie How can I do work I’m passionate about?) Write it on a post-it and put it up on your bathroom mirror or the back of your front door. After 48-hours, journal what answers came up for you and be sure to evaluate them.

Post-it note? Are you kidding. Where am I going to find a post-it note?

Biggest Challenge at the Moment: (Other than I have no Post-it notes) Lost my voice.

Question from Challenge: How to acquire a useful voice.

Answers and Evaluation:

  • Stop reading insipid crap and start reading works by authors with voices worth stealing, er, borrowing. Not sure this exercise takes me in that direction, though it makes my lips curl in smile; somewhat smug; remembering a 7th grade English teacher, an innocent at 55 years who never traveled beyond state lines, trying to explain Silas Marner, a pre-industrial tale written by an English woman named George, to a room of bored American boys and girls whose primary literary sources were Stan Lee and Beatrice Potter and whose only dramatic experiences emanated from cathode ray tubes.
  • Try not to write run-on sentences. Though fun for the writer they tend to piss off readers.
  • Bury seriousness. If Pen does not have tongue planted firmly in cheek, chances are the lazier, uglier, dimwitted, brother of Muse has locked Muse Proper in the closet again.
  • Practice, practice, practice does not always work. Honest. It keeps the fingers and hand muscles toned but can, if pushed too far, dull the mind. When writing produces over-serious, proselytizing prose, stop writing and organize; make outlines, mind-maps or a new pot of coffee. Digging the same ditch, again and again, ruins the dirt, wastes the day and interferes with drinking.
  • Politics distract from art. Stop thinking about politics. My politics run too conventional to be of interest to Pen or reader. Stop writing political drivel. It’ll save up to 72 hours a day – guaranteed or your money back.

Could keep writing excuses for another hour or so but nothing of value appeared in the few minutes invested thus far. I doubt anything of value is likely to appear with more time invested.

So. Finished. Yes. To liking? Not so much. Enough to move on. Yup.

Posted in Observations, Trust30 | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Trust30 Day 3: Personal Illusions

What’s one strong belief you possess that isn’t shared by your closest friends or family?

What inspires this belief?

What have you done to actively live it?


Language contributes more than direct experience to the realities people adopt.

Our species is the symbol making species.

We recognize and create patterns. We employ symbols to simplify and share patterns.

We assemble symbols into languages.

Through languages, people project and inherit realities – each reality altered by personal history, made true by personal languages and manipulated by group languages – languages assembled from patterns of symbols of patterns of symbols of patterns and on forever to the beginning of time.

Dislike, hatred and war erupt from clashes between personal realities. People destroy people for using unfamiliar symbols to represent familiar concepts. People destroy people for relating unfamiliar concepts to familiar symbols.


Perhaps this is the conceit concealed in the metaphoric Garden of Eden debacle and the poetic but inevitable collapse of Bifrost.


I do not write to transfer meaning but to elicit response. My fingers draw letters into more than words and words into more than phrases. Punctuation & pronunciation tremble pitch and stumble rhythm for Mind’s ear. Like a maladroit wizard, I weave insipid spells intended to evoke cognitive responses from readers I have not met and cannot see. By calling forth cognitive responses, I alter personal realities. Neither agreement or disagreement matter.

This has been condensed from many pages and the condensing eliminated my broad definition of languages: languages of speech, letters, numbers, motion, music, form, color and more are meant. To think of the language of letters only does not work, at least not for me.

Posted in Observations, Trust30 | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Trust30 Day Two

Describe the day in one sentence.

Today is like every other day, blending yesterday and tomorrow; a band of light in the sky of time brushed with colors like no others.

© 2011 Chrome Poet

Posted in Observations, Trust30 | Leave a comment

Trust30 Day 1: Ageism

They’ve given me fifteen minutes and a keyboard.

Idiots. They have no idea how foolish I can look in fifteen minutes.

To begin -

We waste age.

Illusions ingrained by social messaging permeate our culture. Social, political, economic, religious – every aspect of our timid existence dims beneath clouds of delusion. Social-programming paints belief on a foundation of idolized youth and fear of aging and death. Media and dogma reinforce fear with hope; hope we avoid appearing aged; hope and promises that we transcend Death.

Make no mistake. We will age. We will die. Deny this simple truth until the eleventh hour when nothing more can be done. It matters not. You will age until you fall into darkness. Only in darkness does aging cease.

Ranking differences between young and old, putting one above the other, sets the stage for social folly. Fear of aging prevents transition of middle-age roles into old-age roles. At fifty, we avoid the question “Are we ready to be sixty.” because we tremble at the thought of sixty. We do not spend time preparing ourselves to become elders.

The young justifiably perceive the powerful-old as barriers and the subservient-old as over. Not because the old lack assets to share but because the powerful-old refuse to share and the subservient-old do not know what to share. Our culture places little value on lessons learned and less value on passing our wisdom to the next generation. Instead, old-timers, clinging to the past, demand obedience and subservience of young-adults condemned to eternal childhood.

Peter Pan never threatened to take over the corner office.

Trying to avoid being over, old-timers cling desperately to achievements of time past. Defying reason, they refuse roles as mentors. The old push the young away hoping distance will delay advancing generations; generations that must replace them. The old who hold power legislate young adults to children, and deny these children of advanced age liberties inalienable to young adults.

In our society, the old feel material goods, a trivial value relative to life lessons, enough to give back. In return for loans, cash and promised estates parents insist on obedience, dependence and obligation.

Our society refuses to nurture a concept of transformation from learner to teacher – the natural journey from naive, insatiable curiosity to vessel of wisdom; from questioning and study to teaching and coaching.

Old adults blame the young adults.

“The young do not listen.”

Why should they? Old adults ask for obedience and respect not because they’ve earned it but because they are old.

“We did everything for you.”

Before we ask the young to listen, we need to make room for them to get comfortable; let them sit in our chair, take our desks and occupy our offices. The young want to get on with their lives. We need to let them live, make decisions, succeed where they succeed and fail where they fail.

At sixty, we come to a time for sharing life lessons. Share, not tell. If someone listens, good, they listen. If not, oh well, not. Share without expectation. The next generation, with or without our input, must make their own mistakes. Our role is to point out the rough, not to swing the club.

Failing to point out the rough spots, we fail as old adults more than young adults fail by not listening.

Fifteen minutes and the keyboard are gone. So much more to say. No more time.

This post contains a thing I wrote as part of Trust30. Trust30 is a 30 day writing challenge that has something to do with Seth Godin. Click on the banner at the top of the page to learn more.

I do not usually participate in challenges. Why I signed up for this one, I cannot say. Maybe I thought it would end writers block.

Now I feel committed. And as I write this, I am a day behind.

The first day results disappoint me, which is why I post a day late. I had to get the courage to post this (writers block?)

I easily found something to say but the way I said it, bah. The challenge asked for a story. I started with story language but quickly regressed to philosophy, opinion and public whinging.

Treating it as stream of consciousness, in contrast to essay or narrative, makes it less embarrassing.

ageism forms the basis of this post and though I feel I cheat to do so, I have a few additional points to make about ageism.

Ageism is real. More real for some than others.

I indulge in an ageism of sorts with this post. I have the right. I am old.

Ageism differs from career path to career path. In politics ageism seems absent. Given the state of politics, some ageism might be desirable.

I hear peers complain about ageism and agree it is not fair. But it was not fair how easily, as clean shaven white guys, many of us climbed the social ladder when we were young.

We fail to create ourselves into good examples of older adults. Our society does not nurture a good model for relationships between young adults and old adults. As a result old adults cling to youth, try to protect roles assumed in middle age and refuse to mature into mentors, gurus and sages. Ageism results. This, I hope, came across in my story.

I hoped to get across the idea that people older than 55 have value, but the value might not be what they think it is. I am not sure this came across.

Posted in Observations, Trust30 | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Chromeku: Snowsky Geese

Snowsky northward geese.

Icebound sunsong daffodils.

Changing of the guard.

Posted in Chromeku, Fast Poem | Leave a comment